|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Psychology & Self-Improvement
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Wednesday, 01 February 2012 00:00 |
|
Q: Your ideas on psychology and self-help make sense. I know they are rational, but I don’t always feel them. My logic is rational, but my feelings are not. What am I supposed to do? Just ignore my feelings? What role can psychological counseling play, if any?
Dr. Hurd replies: This is what many people say to me (or themselves) when faced with an inner conflict. Think about what it means. In effect, you are saying: reality is no more important than my emotions. What I feel is just as important as what’s objectively true.
It’s almost as if you expect your feelings to be valid no matter how much logic and experience shows you otherwise. You need to change the way you look at your feelings – not just abstractly and intellectually, but step-by-concrete-step. Feelings are not blind guides to action. When your feelings are not self-defeating or self-destructive, you should of course
|
|
Read more... [Free Will: The Engine of Mental Health]
|
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Society & Culture
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Tuesday, 31 January 2012 00:00 |
|
Several months ago, Obama referred to what he considers the essence of America: He said, "This sense of mutual responsibility – the idea that I am my brother’s keeper; that I am my sister’s keeper – has always been a part of what makes our country special."
Actually, this isn't true. You can agree or disagree with Obama that being your brother's or sister's keeper is the right moral approach. I profoundly disagree. But regardless of where you stand on that issue, America is not the only place where people take care of each other. People take care of each other in all kinds of countries. Unfortunately, in many countries people don't take care of themselves. This is what made America stand out. In America, especially
|
|
Read more... [Obama's America: One Big, Gigantic Soup Kitchen]
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Monday, 30 January 2012 00:00 |
|
Dear Dr. Hurd: If you don't mind suggestions on articles, have you ever written one on the evils of "enabling"? That is, the phenomenon where a person knows that what someone else is doing is wrong, sometimes morally, but will conduct themselves in a way that allows that person to continue with their bad behavior.
For instance, I've dealt with people who have psychological problems that sometimes move them to lash out or otherwise act in unacceptable manners, and the days following the outbreak they pretend nothing ever happened. Worse yet, they're aided by their victims in that they too pretend nothing ever happened and will even pretend that they like and are still fond of the person, despite the fact they openly detest them out of their sight.
I think commenting on this topic would be both good political commentary and self-help advice. I've been thinking about your article that muses that some of our statist problems today may be due to people trying to silence "internal noise," in that they're trying to deal with their own problems by externalizing them and forcing others to engage in their demanded modes of behavior.
Enabling may be one of the keys to all the evils in this world, as a sub-variant to Ayn Rand's term of "The Sanction of the Victim." If people keep pretending obscene and immoral people are alright and worth dealing with, and actually help them in their bad ways, then they're assisting in promoting destruction in this world, whether it be the destruction of happiness in relationships or people's rights under the government.
Dr. Hurd's reply: "Enabling" is actually a value-free term. It refers to
|
|
Read more... [The Destruction of "Enabling]
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Politics & Government
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Sunday, 29 January 2012 00:00 |
|
A flat income tax -- say, 15 percent for all Americans -- is a brilliant idea. Right?
No way. The flat tax proposal, in the economy as we know it, evades two very, very important facts. No proposal which evades relevant facts can -- or should -- win.
First of all, according to all the numbers available, half of Americans
|
|
Read more... [The 46 Percent]
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 2 of 361 |