Whose Side Are You On, Obama? |
|
|
|
| Daily Dose of Reason - Politics & Government | ||||
| Thursday, 31 December 2009 00:00 | ||||
There are two aspects to fighting terrorism. One is police enforcement, and the other is foreign policy. The Bush administration could, at least, handle the police enforcement aspect. They could not handle foreign policy because they chose to appease, rather than hold accountable, major state sponsors of terrorism such as Iran. The Obama administration, it appears, cannot even handle the police enforcement aspect of fighting terrorism. Increasingly, we are in visibly greater danger because of it. But it's more than that. For the last year, the American government has not merely been evading the threat from our greatest enemies, as the Bush administration did; it actually sides with them. In Iran, for example, we have a golden opportunity to openly side with the dissidents who want to topple this dangerous dictatorship that sponsors so much terrorism. Instead, the American government validates the "legitimacy" of the dictatorship by insisting on talks and negotiations -- talks that the dictatorship does not even care to have. As terrorist threats against America continue to escalate, voters will be right to blame the Obama administration for its technical incompetence. But the deeper incompetence is ideological, not tactical. In other words: If you show more sympathy to the enemy than to your friends, you make yourself more vulnerable to attack, not less.
|
||||
Special Feature
Featured
Shopping
Books & Booklets Audio Commentaries, Interviews & Advice Articles & Essays Coaching/Therapy Newsletter Newsletter Back Issues MerchandiseOther
Shopper and Email login
Shopping Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.
Wait for the payment page to appear after your order is confirmed. If you haven't entered your payment information, your order will not be completed. When ordering instant downloads, your shipping and credit card billing addresses must match. Problems? Call 302-539-5986 or contact Dr. Hurd.
DR. HURD'S NEW BOOK!
Click here to purchase your autographed copy!(Choose domestic or International delivery. Price includes shipping.)
Daily Dose Mug
Get your official Daily Dose Coffee Mug! Click "merchandise" in the shopping menu to the left. Psychotherapy
Want to address an issue head on in a peaceful, oceanside location? Come to the beaches of Delaware for our special Reflection...by the Sea package.Stop and Think...
" Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. "Thomas Jefferson
Recent News
- Making Peace With Bullies Never Ends Well
- Peter, Paul, Barack and Mitt
- "It's Not Fair!! Why Me?"
- The Psychology of Sexual Abuse
- Rehab: An empty promise?
- Free Will: The Engine of Mental Health
- Obama's America: One Big, Gigantic Soup Kitchen
- The Destruction of "Enabling"
- The 46 Percent
- The Psychology of Honesty (Part 3 of 3)



There are two aspects to fighting terrorism. One is police enforcement, and the other is foreign policy. The Bush administration could, at least, handle the police enforcement aspect. They could not handle foreign policy because they chose to appease, rather than hold accountable, major state sponsors of terrorism such as Iran. The Obama administration, it appears, cannot even handle the police enforcement aspect of fighting terrorism. Increasingly, we are in visibly greater danger because of it. But it's more than that. For the last year, the American government has not merely been evading the threat from our greatest enemies, as the Bush administration did; it actually sides with them. In Iran, for example, we have a golden opportunity to openly side with the dissidents who want to topple this dangerous dictatorship that sponsors so much terrorism. Instead, the American government validates the "legitimacy" of the dictatorship by insisting on talks and negotiations -- talks that the dictatorship does not even care to have. As terrorist threats against America continue to escalate, voters will be right to blame the Obama administration for its technical incompetence. But the deeper incompetence is ideological, not tactical. In other words: If you show more sympathy to the enemy than to your friends, you make yourself more vulnerable to attack, not less.
