The Coming Neutered Internet |
|
|
|
| Daily Dose of Reason - Politics & Government | ||||
| Saturday, 24 October 2009 00:00 | ||||
The FCC wants to take ownership of the Internet through something dubious called "net neutrality." You can be sure that once the government is involved, there will be nothing neutral about it. Obama's head of the FCC talks about wanting to keep the Internet "robust," and flatly states that government must be involved, or "invested," to make this happen. So what does "robust" mean? Whatever the government -- specifically, the Obama administration -- decides that it means. If government is going to have say over the content of the Internet, then America had better get busy and vote in a divided government. Otherwise, there will be a one-size fits all approach to content on the Internet, determined by the government. Imagine Oprah or MSNBC in charge of all political and social commentary. The Internet is so huge, complex, and ever-changing that this is one important cause for hope. Even the Communist government of China cannot control the Internet as it would like. But just because the nature of the Internet makes totalitarian control impossible does not mean that regulation will not give us, at best, a neutered Internet. What else could "net neutrality" possibly amount to, in practice? The Internet has done just fine without government. That's precisely why government wants to be involved.
|
||||
Special Feature
Featured
Shopping
Books & Booklets Audio Commentaries, Interviews & Advice Articles & Essays Coaching/Therapy Newsletter Newsletter Back Issues MerchandiseOther
Shopper and Email login
Shopping Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.
Wait for the payment page to appear after your order is confirmed. If you haven't entered your payment information, your order will not be completed. When ordering instant downloads, your shipping and credit card billing addresses must match. Problems? Call 302-539-5986 or contact Dr. Hurd.
DR. HURD'S NEW BOOK!
Click here to purchase your autographed copy!(Choose domestic or International delivery. Price includes shipping.)
Daily Dose Mug
Get your official Daily Dose Coffee Mug! Click "merchandise" in the shopping menu to the left. Psychotherapy
Want to address an issue head on in a peaceful, oceanside location? Come to the beaches of Delaware for our special Reflection...by the Sea package.Stop and Think...
" I'm very motivated by money. And I found that money makes you happy. So the old adage is WRONG. I'm happiER with money than I was in my studio apartment for seven years. "Kathy Griffin
Recent News
- Why Obama Failed
- "Waste Not, Want Not" -- Another Myth!
- All Children Left Behind
- Aristotle on Private Property
- "It's for your own good."
- Get past the past!
- Now France Has a Socialist President, Too
- What's A Few Trillion of Other People's Money Between Friends?
- DSM-V Exposes Psychiatry as the "Science" of Majority Vote and Focus Groups
- Liberals are the True Conservatives



The FCC wants to take ownership of the Internet through something dubious called "net neutrality." You can be sure that once the government is involved, there will be nothing neutral about it. Obama's head of the FCC talks about wanting to keep the Internet "robust," and flatly states that government must be involved, or "invested," to make this happen. So what does "robust" mean? Whatever the government -- specifically, the Obama administration -- decides that it means. If government is going to have say over the content of the Internet, then America had better get busy and vote in a divided government. Otherwise, there will be a one-size fits all approach to content on the Internet, determined by the government. Imagine Oprah or MSNBC in charge of all political and social commentary. The Internet is so huge, complex, and ever-changing that this is one important cause for hope. Even the Communist government of China cannot control the Internet as it would like. But just because the nature of the Internet makes totalitarian control impossible does not mean that regulation will not give us, at best, a neutered Internet. What else could "net neutrality" possibly amount to, in practice? The Internet has done just fine without government. That's precisely why government wants to be involved.
