|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Monday, 30 January 2012 00:00 |
|
Dear Dr. Hurd: If you don't mind suggestions on articles, have you ever written one on the evils of "enabling"? That is, the phenomenon where a person knows that what someone else is doing is wrong, sometimes morally, but will conduct themselves in a way that allows that person to continue with their bad behavior.
For instance, I've dealt with people who have psychological problems that sometimes move them to lash out or otherwise act in unacceptable manners, and the days following the outbreak they pretend nothing ever happened. Worse yet, they're aided by their victims in that they too pretend nothing ever happened and will even pretend that they like and are still fond of the person, despite the fact they openly detest them out of their sight.
I think commenting on this topic would be both good political commentary and self-help advice. I've been thinking about your article that muses that some of our statist problems today may be due to people trying to silence "internal noise," in that they're trying to deal with their own problems by externalizing them and forcing others to engage in their demanded modes of behavior.
Enabling may be one of the keys to all the evils in this world, as a sub-variant to Ayn Rand's term of "The Sanction of the Victim." If people keep pretending obscene and immoral people are alright and worth dealing with, and actually help them in their bad ways, then they're assisting in promoting destruction in this world, whether it be the destruction of happiness in relationships or people's rights under the government.
Dr. Hurd's reply: "Enabling" is actually a value-free term. It refers to
|
|
Read more... [The Destruction of "Enabling]
|
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Saturday, 21 January 2012 00:00 |
|
A company hosts a press conference to show how caring and compassionate it is. The CEO of the company, dressed in a top-of-the-line suit, stands in front of the television cameras with his arms around a homeless man who has not bathed for several days. This, we are supposed to believe, makes the company’s CEO a good person.
A political leader is exposed for deceitful behavior. The day after the exposure, he and his wife volunteer in a soup kitchen. We’re supposed to believe that he is still a good person, despite the wrongdoing he more or less acknowledged.
It is easy to become
|
|
Read more... [Greatness Unrealized]
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Monday, 26 December 2011 00:00 |
|
In response to my comment that there' s no shame in hating the contemptible, an irate reader wrote in with the following quote from Martin Luther King, Jr.: "Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that. Hate multiplies hate, violence multiplies violence, and toughness multiplies toughness in a descending spiral of destruction. So when Jesus says "Love your enemies," he is setting forth a profound and ultimately inescapable admonition. ... The chain reaction of evil — hate begetting hate, wars producing more wars — must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation."
So let me get this straight. Loving your enemies is the way to protect yourself. Or, protecting yourself is wrong. By this standard,
|
|
Read more... [Morality Means Survival, Not Self-Destruction]
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Thursday, 08 December 2011 00:00 |
|
I recently encountered a psychologist who said, in essence, "People are doing the best they can; and they're getting something out of what they're doing." He maintained, and he's right, that psychologists and therapists especially should keep this in mind. He's largely right. Any therapist knows that once you find out more about a person's situation, no matter how irrational something seems out-of-context, it makes sense to the person doing it. As one lady puts it, "I can't stop smoking. It's the only time I have for myself. It's just for me."
This is what we have to remember. When you tell someone, or expect someone, to give up something that seems plainly irrational, you're also asking them to give up something else. Like this lady with her smoking. Of course she should stop smoking. The wisdom and rationality of this policy
|
|
Read more... [Are People Doing the Best They Can?]
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Sunday, 04 December 2011 00:00 |
Back to the case of Henry Judd Gray. Let’s assume that Mencken’s assessment
|
|
Read more... [Thinking in Absolutes: Healthier Than You Realize (Part 3 of 3)]
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 25 |