|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 00:00 |
A world in which everyone takes care of everyone else, and nobody takes care of himself--is a world that will perish. A world in which everyone takes care of him- or herself is a world from which everyone benefits. If the purpose of morality is to make the world a better place, then how far can morality take us without a recognition of this basic point? |
|
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Saturday, 20 June 2009 00:00 |
|
Absolute certainty IS possible. This is self-evident. If it weren't, then you'd be forced to claim: "I'm absolutely certain that absolute certainty is impossible." Or, you'd be forced to claim: "I'm certain that I can be certain of nothing."
At the same time, absolute certainty does not mean guaranteed truth. In other words: Just because it's possible to be sure, or to be objectively right, doesn't mean I'm right just because I say so. I have to PROVE it. So do you.
This applies not only to matters of science and philosophy, but also to matters of everyday life--say, to issues that arise in marital and business relationships. Proving your certainty is your own responsibility. And you cannot achieve it through slamming doors, shouting, maniplating, lying or intimidating.
The second worst type of person, to me, is the type of person who claims that certainty is impossible. This is idiocy and, usually, hypocrisy as well. The worst type of person, to me, is the type who endorses the idea of certainty while then proclaiming he's right, but refuses to prove it. There is something worse--something darker, and more sinister--about this than mere idiocy or hypocrisy. This is the sort of person who gives certainty a bad name--and whom, you can be sure, is certain of nothing. |
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Friday, 12 June 2009 00:00 |
There are worse things than bad ideas. The worst thing is a bad idea posing as a new one--or a rotten idea disguised as something different, fresh, and original. The first is merely a mistake, while the second is fraud. |
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Sunday, 31 May 2009 00:00 |
When I wish someone "good luck," it's not a compliment. It's not a wish of bad intentions either, but it's a way of indicating that I think luck is the most important thing they have going for them. This isn't because luck IS the most important thing. It's because I think the person to whom I say this doesn't use his free will (i.e. his mind) very well--and luck or chance are all that he has left. |
|
Daily Dose of Reason -
Ethics
|
|
Written by Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D.
|
|
Monday, 25 May 2009 00:00 |
Working for the happiness of others cheats others out of the process of achieving happiness. It conveys to them: "You can't become happy on your own; you need me." This denies that happiness is an achievement. If you could somehow "download" the totality of the experience of happiness on to the psyche of another, it wouldn't matter. The process of achieving happiness is as important as the result. |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 16 of 25 |